« Bush has contempt for the evangelicals | Main | China's labor laws and corporate fire alarms »

Right-wing talk radio: Republican talking points

I have long believed that talk radio in the U.S. is the achilles heal of our political system. At first glance, talk radio is democratic and consistent with the First Amendment because people call in and speak their mind to a host who engages them in dialogue. If you like reading letters to the editor, talk radio is like a national letters page.

But the ideal of an enlightened talk radio community will never come to pass. That why one of the few efforts to create a liberal talk radio empire is stumbling. Talk radio as it exists in the United States consists of a series of phone calls from listeners, each speaking for about 20 seconds before the host responds and throws out some pious opinion that may or may not bear some relationship with the caller's statements. Then the host takes another call.

These links will give the uninitiated a sense of the drivel that passes for informed political discussion on American talk radio. Click here for the most popular host of them all, Rush Limbaugh, a blowhard whose booming voice is part of the AM radio landscape the way that Pink Floyd is synonmous with FM radio. In turn, the shallowest of them all, Sean Hannity, dominates Fox News at night and has the drive-time slot on WABC radio in New York and hundreds of other markets. Michael Savage is simply emotionally disturbed. These guys owe a debt to the now-retired Bob Grant, who poisoned the New York airwaves for decades with racially-charged nonsense. The people sway millions of voters. If you want to know why Bush and co. keep winning elections, listen to these guys, or at least click the links to see what they're saying.

I listen to right-wing talk radio the way that other people slow down to see a car accident. It is impossible to resist the garbage that passes for political debate these days. The callers are dumb. The hosts are dumber. But what's important is these people vote and certainly are the reason why conservative Republican candidates prevail in tight races. If you know nothing about current events other than what you hear on talk radio, you'd vote Republican, too, in the belief that the opposition party and liberals/leftists are evil and dangerous.

Nearly all the popular and profitable talk radio hosts in the U.S. are conservative. There is a reason for this. Sloganeering and flag-waving is much easier to articulate in this format than serious discussion about structural problems with our system of government and historical analyses. That's what books and magazine articles are for. These ideas simply cannot be squeezed into a 10 to 20 second phone call. Rational thought cannot be compressed this way.

What got me thinking about this was a recent blog piece on the use of Republican Party talking points on talk radio. Read the piece here. Anyone listening to talk radio knows this must be true. I hear the same Republican-based arguments over and over on talk radio, the facts be damned. These shows are emotional and angry. As Thomas Frank pointed out in his book, What's the Matter with Kansas, the arc of discontent in this country leans right. Much of the dialogue on these shows consists of attacks on the opposition, i.e., liberals, the Democratic Party and leftists who want to destroy the country, are weak on terror and hate George W. Bush. In a country that largely rejects Bush and his policies the few remaining supporters are speed-dialing to speak with Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and other blowhards who re-assure them that they are right and that the opposition hates America and is intellectual dishonest.

Here is the blog entry from Prospect.org (links in the original entry):

TALK RADIO HOSTS AND CALLERS GETTING THEIR TALKING POINTS STRAIGHT FROM GOP. This is on the light side, but it's fun and worth a quick note. If you've ever wondered why right-wing talk radio is so often devoid of any real dialogue, this might help explain why: It turns out that the hosts and the listeners who call in and speak are getting their talking points straight from the GOP.

Seriously. If you go to the Republican National Committee's Web site and click where it says "call talk radio," you'll find yourself on this page. It lists the phone numbers of many major talk show hosts, but that's not all: It also offers a list of "talking points" for callers to use when they call the shows. Among them: "Stand with President Bush on increased defense spending that better prepares and protects our military," and "stand with President Bush in his efforts to protect the homeland by controlling the borders." You can see a screen grab of the page below.

The RNC's site also offers these helpful tips for callers:

Plan What You Are Going to Say: Print or write out your talking points to help you plan what you are going to say before you are on the air...
Be Clear and Concise: When you get on the air, sound upbeat and excited to be on the program.

What about the hosts? Well, they're getting their talking points from the same place the callers are -- the Republican National Committee. From the Washington Post:

The RNC is shipping reams of information to conservative radio hosts, television commentators and bloggers. Those GOP talking points detail the Democratic connections of groups including the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and American Family Voices, which are working to turn the scandal into an issue with national implications. And this is by no means an isolated case. So both hosts and callers are at least in some cases repeating lines fed to them by the RNC. Talk about an echo-chamber.

One reason this is interesting is that there isn't anything really comparable on the other side. Yes, Dem party officials, organizers and other liberal groups constantly urge supporters to write letters to newspapers, and even in some cases supply actual language. But the Democratic National Committee simply can't ship its talking points straight to editors of newspapers, secure in the knowledge that those talking points will faithfully and regularly be echoed in editorials and in letters to the editor.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.psychsound.com/mt-tb.cgi/59

Comments (2)

Maria Cavit:

Dear Steve

Talk-back radio is also popular Down Under. Once-upon-a-time whenever I left Europe to return 'home' for holidays, I found it the fastest way to understanding what was going on in society.

During my last visit 'home', it became apparent that there was a prevalent problem in schools with bullying, and that discussion really interested me since my nephew was one child being bullied at the time.

I listened to that discussion, in my car, for at least 45 minutes, and all I can say is this: if I must believe that people that call talk-back radio are really indicative of society in general, I lose all hope. All (as in every single one of the dozen plus) callers advocated that parents of bullied children go around to the homes of the bully's parents and "punch the father on the nose" to stop the bullying from continuing! I swear, there wasn't a single caller that didn't consider this behaviour as the most appropriate solution to the problem at hand! And several callers informed - to their immense pride and satisfaction - that they had done exactly that with good results!!!

Yes, talk-back hosts and callers are 'dumb'. Let's just hope they're the minority in society... and that most of them are either too dumb or too lazy to vote!

sam f.:

Hi Steve.

Your car accident analogy instantly brought to mind a lecture I attended at my university this thursday.

The speaker was David Frum. The half of an hour that I managed to endure of this lecture is captured well in the idea of slowing down to gawk at at a car accident.

After all, I was going to the lecture not because I was moved to, but because it was required for my poli-sci class. I was innocently cruising right along in low awareness mode (I knew he had been a speech writer for Bush, but I never anticipated that anything that this man would say could be challenging to me), when I noticed that the three young men seated about the hall in orange coveralls were now placing black execution-style hoods over their heads.

I began to rubberneck around, the scene approaching as thick necks swathed in suits flitted about like the faker fuzz they were, eyeing the brightly clad fellows, and even myself (I had not given my army green fashionably fatiguesque jacket a second thought until that moment).

Then the introducer for Frum addressed the crowd like an apologetic flag person, doing his job in words while silently assenting to the ugliness of the circumstances.

Mr. Frum took the podium and began his performance. It was part personal narrative of a naive Canadian in the big white house; part platform of the Bush administration; part propoganda of war on terror, but mostly lies. The same lies we've heard over and over again, only this time they were being said right to my face. He not only spun lies and misinformation willfully, but did so in such a slick showman's manner that I can only conclude that the man's disrespect for his audience was absolute. He went on with his speech spreading discrimination under a guise of benefaction and comraderie. But that isn't the worst of it. The worst was when I realised that I was surrounded by some of the most educated persons in my community, and that many of them were laughing at his jokes, eating every stinking fecal word.

I am regretful for not calling the man out before I left, unable to suffer this horror a moment longer. I am also regretful for not staying to see how the orange clad fellows fared.

I have seen the face of "the axis of evil." Quite frankly, it scared the shit out of me.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 13, 2006 10:58 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Bush has contempt for the evangelicals.

The next post in this blog is China's labor laws and corporate fire alarms.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.


Psychsound by Steve Bergstein is published by Planet Waves, Inc.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.32
Copyright © 2006-2007 by Planet Waves, Inc. Other copyrights may apply.   Back to Planet Waves